Thread Reader

sexnotgender.info

@Sexnotgender_

1h

20 tweets
Twitter

Clarks Shoes

@clarksshoes

Sep 21View on Twitter

Named one of London’s most influential people by the Evening Standard, Jamie Windust is an award-winning non-binary author, host and LGTBQIA+ trailblazer who has written for everyone from Gay Times to British GQ.

Show this thread

Hi @Clarks Shoes @EHRC @Kishwer Falkner @Kishwer Falkner @Liz Truss @Government Equalities Office The 'Diversity Monitoring' section of your job application says "Diversity information is collected for the purposes of monitoring and reporting only". 1/20

As it is a part of your job application process, I assume its purpose is to help you to ensure that you are recruiting without unlawfully discriminating under the Equality Act 2010, which is not the same as 'diversity monitoring' or 'inclusion': sexnotgender.info/equality-diver… 2/20

I also note the EHRC guidance on this: Good equality practice for employers: equality policies, equality training and monitoring equalityhumanrights.com/sites/default/… 3/20

You ask for 'Gender' with options: Male Female 4/20

'Gender' is not a protected characteristic under the Equality Act 2010 and is not defined in the Act. legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/15/… 5/20

Sex is the protected characteristic and the only two possible options for sex are 'Female' and 'Male' as defined in the Act and consistent with biology, but you don't ask for that. legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/15/… 'Gender' is not a synonym for sex. 6/20

See also: ‘Gender’ is not a protected characteristic, admits EHRC sexnotgender.info/gender-is-not-… 7/20

The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) has come in for a lot of criticism in recent years for its silence and lack of clarity on the difference between sex and 'gender' in terms of the...

sexnotgender.info/gender-is-not-…

'Gender' is not a protected characteristic, admits EHRC

As female and male are the terms in the Act relating to the protected characteristic of sex, using them for some other question can only be confusing and could lead to gathering inconsistent and contradictory data. 8/20

'Gender' and similar terms rely on demeaning, regressive stereotypical notions of societal roles for the two sexes, concepts with which I'm sure you would not wish to be associated. 9/20

There is a protected characteristic of 'gender reassignment', but it is defined in the Act in terms different to those you use here and you don't ask about this protected characteristic. legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/15/… 10/20

If you don't collect data on the Equality Act's protected characteristic of gender reassignment you cannot know that you are not discriminating against those with that protected characteristic. 11/20

Asking about a personal characteristic such as 'gender' that is not a protected characteristic under the Act, may be in breach of the UK GDPR by processing personal - and potentially Special Category - data without a lawful basis. 12/20

The Government provides a list of the personal data an employer may hold about an employee without their permission that you might also find useful. 'Gender' does not appear on that list, but sex does. gov.uk/personal-data-… 13/20

The EHRC state that information about a person's 'transgender status' is Special Category personal information under the UK GDPR. Sex is not, so conflating sex and 'gender' may cause issues in processing the information lawfully. equalityhumanrights.com/en/publication… 14/20

If you choose not to gather data on specific protected characteristics (such as sex), you cannot have the information required to ascertain whether or not you could be discriminating on protected characteristics in recruitment. This could be vital in an employment tribunal. 15/20

If you choose to discriminate on characteristics (such as 'gender') that are not protected characteristics under the Act, you may inadvertently indirectly discriminate on protected characteristics. 16/20

You might also like to take note of what employment and discrimination Barrister Akua Reindorf said in her report for the University of Essex and in particular Recommendation 18: cloisters.com/reindorf-revie… 17/20

I would also suggest you read this report that highlights the risks and dangers (both reputational and legal) of relying on and processing inaccurate, misleading or downright wrong information about protected characteristics under the Equality Act. sex-matters.org/posts/updates/… 18/20

Language and meaning of words are important and proper use & understanding of terms is vital so that the public is aware of what rights they have and what your duties are. Any confusion or inconsistency over meaning may prevent people from accessing their rights in law. 19/20

Will you undertake to correct these errors and to review all your other policies, documents, reports, etc to ensure compliance? Please respond. sexnotgender.info/list @Thread Reader App unroll 20/20

sexnotgender.info

@Sexnotgender_

Sex. Not gender. It's in black and white. In the Equality Act. See website for disclaimer.

Follow on Twitter

Missing some tweets in this thread? Or failed to load images or videos? You can try to .