Thread Reader
Ranier Styles Grant

Ranier Styles Grant
@RanierGrant

Sep 23, 2022
16 tweets
Twitter

The CFTC's Case against bZx is an Example of "Regulation By Enforcement To Build Precedent". The Real Reason They're Doing This Is To Crminilize/Prosecute/Extradite Governance People On Platforms Like DYDX arbitrum, and Especially the v4 Cosmos DYDX Chain.

I need to recap some things The US uses bilateral agreements intergovernmental agreements and intelligence agency 5 Eyes with the EU and countless other UN countries to sue, prosecute, imprison, and extradite Non US Citizens who violate US Financial Compliance Laws.
The Main tool the US is using to sue Forex and Crypto are not SEC and CFTC laws, but rather Sanctions, Foreign account Tax Compliance act, and The Banking Secrecy act It is impossible for DeFi to comply with The investment company act or the Dodd Frank act
The CFTC is sueing a Dao, explicitly and intentionally The US government wants base layer censorship on L1 protocols The US government is going to sue the multi-sig holders of L2 rollup layers like arbitrum
The US government reduced US forex to three, only three companies, using these same laws, Forex dot com, IG Gain Capital, and Oanda. Do you want that to happen to crypto? Did you know that no forex broker in the world is allowed to service US citizens but those three companies?
You're probably asking yourself just why is the government so obsessed with banning derivatives related to crypto and taking away leverage from US citizens, that they continue to do this.
Well all we really have is conjecture, but at a minimum, we have to know that the major Chicago Mercantile Exchange is lobbying behind our backs to make it happen, this is crony capitalism, I'm sure other large commodity firms like Doorman, Stonestreet,
Phillips Capital, RBJ O'brian, these Chicago goons are no doubt piling on behind closed doors. SBF has tried to get in their good graces, but he's done nothing for DeFi.
There is no fundamental way to save permissionless DeFi unless the US governments approach to Two Party Three Party doctrine on the Banking Secrecy act is beat and amended and codified in congress and Scotus.
National Security is getting in the way of crypto, and the crony capitalist are hiding behind it to protect their rent seeking. The Banking Secrecy act's involvement with DeFi must be struck down in the Supreme Court, and major codified modifications to it
related to DeFi must be codified in the House and Senate. You must pressure and hold your European and asian country parliment's accountable for their collusion with these bilateral agreements with the united states for its collateral
impact on foreign DeFi developers, america is literally disallowing sovereign countries to developing DeFi by simply colluding with crooked EU and UK security state people. The Dutch judge has this developer in prison by the way because the US authority
likely forced the Netherlands hand on it, we have intelligence agreements we often use to do things like this to EU and australian citizen who do not have Bill of Rights protection, we often use foreign intelligence agencies to do illegal spying that cannot be done domestically.
If you agree with most of this please try to help get the message out so we can begin to build policy pushback in congress that doesn't solely benefit VC Silicon Valley insiders, like and retweet this thread folks
Ranier Styles Grant
Ranier's Work account. Work b*tc* work. Procrastination is bad. #Solidity #Python #Javascript api's #finance #btc #defi Twitter is the dark arts.
Follow on Twitter
Missing some tweets in this thread? Or failed to load images or videos? You can try to .