Thread Reader

Clara Jeffery

@ClaraJeffery

5h

9 tweets
Twitter

This should be on every San Franciscan’s mind as they head to the polls. Blocking housing by endless delaying tactics comes with a huge penalty

Robert Fruchtman

@_fruchtose

Sep 23View on Twitter

This is why the housing element is so important to San Francisco. Three projects are seeking over $17.5 million from HCD. This year they qualify. But if the City can't to adopt a certified housing element next year, tens of millions of affordable housing dollars go away.

Show this thread

A piece of math that seems to elude the BOS. If you block 50,000 units of housing, half of which are below market and 1/4 of which are for low income folks, in favor of 5.000 units of pure LE housing, which results in more LE units? a) 5,000 units b) 12,500 units

Now, you can tell your constituents "I only back 100% low-income affordable housing" and they may buy that but in fact you could have had twice as much affordable housing if you'd backed plans that created more of it. This is the central housing argument in CA today.

This is "letting perfect be the enemy of the good" and look around, it's a failing strategy.

Another factor: The Supes who've taken a "I only back affordable housing" stance not only block huges amounts of it, when it *is* built in their district, it's often b/c they've traded set-asides with other districts that build more. They get to look pure, but it's a mirage.

Anyway, a block of the @Board of Supervisors is supposedly planning to block/reject whatever the state plan and even if the state winds up prevailing, it's another example of predatory delay.

Who wins in this game? Well, landlords and homeowners, historically. But blocking so much housing has fueled homelessness which (along with fentanyl and pandemic) is now mortally threatening downtown, and the city's tax base of tech workers/tourism with it.

If the tax base craters, so does funding for...schools, services, everything. And so then will home values. So the people who did well by—or didn't see the impacts of—predatory delay will also lose. Just hubris all the way around.

Just read this, as an example of why the people who claim to be progressive are failing the city. What an ethics and accountability shit show: sfstandard.com/politics/san-f…

TODCO boss John Elberling made a huge mistake trying to tax Amazon. Hundreds of small businesses in SF could pay the price.

sfstandard.com/politics/san-f…

How an SF Housing Nonprofit Blew $500K Trying To Tax Jeff Bezos

Clara Jeffery

@ClaraJeffery

Editor-in-Chief of Mother Jones. President of the American Society of Magazine Editors. Mom. Upzoning, street tree, and rescue dog enthusiast.

Follow on Twitter

Missing some tweets in this thread? Or failed to load images or videos? You can try to .