Thread Reader
Lots of offended responses from 'race realists' here. The big criticism being that it's presumptions of me to assume that intelligence would be advantageous in all environments, because maybe there's some unknown trade-offs b/w environments...
'Race realists' have never provided a coherent explanation for why/how different environments supposedly selected for high or low intelligence alleles during evolutionary history. High intelligence would be advantageous in all environments!

I want these people to explain why the Inuit or Sami don't have a 10,000 cc cranial capacity and teleportation technology at this point.

Bad Anthropology Takes (Real Parody)
Ancient aliens? Rehashed 19th century social theory? Skulls 'n calipers? Word phrenology? Lost continents? We got it all here! DMs open for submissions.
Follow on Twitter
Missing some tweets in this thread? Or failed to load images or videos? You can try to .