Jikkyleaks 
@Jikkyleaks
Jun 22, 2023
24 tweets
FRESH CHEESE 
A new search of the GP prescribing database confirms a MASSIVE safety signal for fertility risk following the COVID vaccine rollout.
The one that @Viki Male told you had no impact on fertility.
Well check the next tweets and then decide.
#OophGate 
A new search of the GP prescribing database confirms a MASSIVE safety signal for fertility risk following the COVID vaccine rollout.
The one that @Viki Male told you had no impact on fertility.
Well check the next tweets and then decide.
#OophGate 
Here it is. The drug which skyrocketed in prescriptions after early 2021 was Estradiol.
HRT.
Why would this drug suddenly be prescribed in rapidly increasing quantities, having been at a steady level for YEARS following its fall from grace?
openprescribing.net/chemical/06040
Of course the answer must be #ClimateChange.
One of the primary symptoms of menopause is hot flushes, and these are worse when it's warm.
So that must be it. Global warming (even though it's getting colder)
It cannot possibly be anything else that happened in early 2021.
What it definitely can't be is anything to do with the global injection of an irritant lipid nanoparticle that was known to accumulate in the ovaries, containing RNA encoding for a foreign protein.
No. Absolutely not.
twitter.com/arkmedic/statu
Because if the world was injected with such an irritant or toxic product that went to the ovaries and potentially caused premature ovarian failure as a result, the regulators such as the @MHRAgovuk @TGA Australia and @U.S. FDA would have told us.
Wouldn't they?
tga.gov.au/sites/default/
And they would have noticed that an early safety signal for such an event (premature ovarian failure) would have been a sudden increase in the prescribing of HRT.
Hormone replacement therapy.
Estradiol.
And the pharmacovigilance people would have halted the rollout, no?
Of course we have been here before.
In the 1970s the pharma companies thought they had "cured" the menopause by dishing out estradiol to as many women as possible.
And then the uterine cancer epidemic happened.
If this happened today, nobody would be allowed to speak out.
The point is that estradiol is not prescribed routinely.
It is not contraceptive estrogen.
The days of routinely prescribing HRT for "menopause" have gone since the Women's Health Initiative study showed a higher rate of heart disease and breast cancer. womenshealth.gov/30-achievement
That was 20 years ago and apart from the pharma shills like @Jennifer Gunter pushing it excessively, prescriptions for HRT - especially in the UK - are low level and very stable.
That's because the risks usually exceed the benefits over age 50.
archive.is/wip/SWZ8K
So a TRIPLING of the prescription of HRT would be unprecedented.
And no, it's not climate change.
It can only represent one thing - that women *under 50* are suddenly being prescribed HRT in record amounts.
And this could only happen if a cohort of otherwise healthy women in their 40s (because the over 50s would be expected to enter menopause) suddenly found themselves in an early menopause.
The GPs wouldn't hesitate to prescribe HRT in that situation.
Which means....
This massive and unprecedented spike in HRT prescribing, most notable in the South East region, is due to something that happened to females aged 40-50 from March 2021 onwards that caused premature ovarian failure in unprecedented numbers.
#OophGate
openprescribing.net/analyse/#org=r
And you can tell that the story needs to be buried because the Pharma-controlled media and their "celebrities" are pushing a new drive for hormone replacement therapy.
So that they can blame the massive rise in prescriptions on "increased awareness"
twitter.com/Jikkyleaks/sta
Jikkyleaks @Jikkyleaks
Jun 22 23
View on Twitter
There are so many things wrong with this article I don't know where to start.
But it's basically propaganda to sell HRT and hide the real story.
Pharma gonna Pharma....
msnbc.com/know-your-valu
But it's another distraction and those individual women going to their GP having a sudden menopause a few years early will just be fobbed off that "it's normal".
Well, it isn't... and almost certainly the bigger issue is in the next tweet.
Which is, that if a whole cohort of 40's women are suddenly entering premature menopause...
What is happening to women under 40 who wanted to get pregnant?
Well, we know the answer don't we?
twitter.com/Jikkyleaks/sta
Jikkyleaks @Jikkyleaks
Jun 15 23
View on Twitter
And if you think this is "normal" the NSW government have a novel mRNA-LNP gene therapy to sell you.
And remember that @Dr. Kate Clancy π³οΈβπ (@KateClancy.bsky.social), who pretended to be looking at this very issue, went on a rant when it was suggested two years ago that women could check their AMH levels before engaging on the COVID therapies.
Who was she protecting?
arkmedic.substack.com/p/whats-your-a
The one saving grace here is that the disaster that has afflicted this newly menopausal cohort of women, if treated with any seriousness at all, could help save the fertility of those not yet affected.
By warning young women not to take these drugs without more data.
And if you are a young woman who might one day in the future want to get pregnant, speak to your doctor about an AMH test.
It could possibly save your fertility.
#OophGate #AMHGate
arkmedic.substack.com/p/whats-your-a
UPDATE: In typical fashion Viki Male posts a paper almost in unison with this thread to suggest that the AMH values are unaffected by the jabs (when tested early on without boosters).
But the paper is a sham. The data is not available to inspection and the estradiol data above proves that there is a major problem, however much the pharma companies try to obfuscate.
These papers that Viki quotes are always locked to inspection, because the authors know that we will find inconsistencies in the data that show that they are either biased, misrepresented or in some cases outright fraud.
twitter.com/Jikkyleaks/sta
@Thread Reader App unroll
For the record these searches were archived (after the #midazolam fiasco)
archive.is/gsaGe
archive.is/hcX9d
DistillatePress@DistillatePress
Jun 23 23
View on Twitter
"We changed our metric, nothing to see here"
-GoogleTrends
UPDATE: Viki Male confirms that the rise is not due to any "Davina effect" at all but due to a rapid rise in diagnoses of premature menopause, so dramatic that it spilled into hospital outpatient episodes.
This is a slam dunk
twitter.com/Jikkyleaks/sta
Jikkyleaks @Jikkyleaks
Jun 24 23
View on Twitter
Another point of note. Viki is trying to conflate all estrogen (HRT) prescriptions, the majority of which are driven by topical (vaginal) estrogen. Those are not relevant to this discussion.
The discussion here is about systemic HRT.
So when Viki says that 90% of prescriptions are for over 40's that's true, but not what we are talking about.
There was a rise up to 2020 in HRT prescribing, then it was static, then it went crazy.
archive.is/3l9eE
twitter.com/VikiLovesFACS/
Jikkyleaks
@Jikkyleaks
Home for @jikkykjj the whistleblowing lab mouse
#Modernagate #CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG #3Tablets
Pronouns: mouse/mouseself
Tweets are public interest disclosures
Missing some tweets in this thread? Or failed to load images or videos? You can try to .