Come on, Mark, don't you remember that that's discredited?
And do you REALLY believe that global average temperatures 3000 years ago are known with a 1σ uncertainty of just 0.2°C, and 2σ (95%) of just 0.4°C? Come on, you have GOT to know that's absurd.
https://twitter.com/ncdave4life/status/1565812082964037634…
2/7. In that revisionist "wheelchair graph" the tiny hiccup in warming trend around 11K years ago is the Younger Dryas (YD). They show cooling of only 0.25°C, spread over 850 years, and undone by 0.25°C of warming over the next 400 years. That's absurd.
https://twitter.com/ncdave4life/status/1565812082964037634…
3/7. Greenland typically sees temperature changes 3-4× greater than the global average, but even if it were 10× greater, that wheelchair graph would still show only 2.5°C Greenland cooling over 850 years, and then 2.5°C warming over 400 years.
6/7. That preposterous "wheelchair" graph also shows the middle of the Dark Ages Cold Period as slightly WARMER than the middle of the Medieval Warm Period. Surely you can recognize how ridiculous that is!
7/7. But you needn't examine such details to see that the graph is propaganda, rather than science. That "safe climate zone" label gives it away. That's obviously 100% pure BS.
During the Eemian Optimum Antarctica was an estimated 3°C WARMER than the top of their "safe zone!"