st The Sneed article is entitled "Ask the Experts…" and the McCrary article is entitled "…Experts Say." Yet both of those journalists are so clueless about their topic that neither of them even knew who the "experts" were to ask! For their articles about agronomy, neither author spoke to a single agronomist!!

Dave Burton
@ncdave4life

May 06 20

View on Twitter

My hypothes.is annotation of that pathetic article is here: hyp.is/pTg6fhEXEeqNPk Click on each highlighted part of the article to read what's wrong with it, in great detail.

This is the enormously misleading ***"nutrient scare."*** The absurdity of the nutrient scare nonsense should be obvious if you think about a simple fact: ***food grown in greenhouses at 1500 ppmv...

hyp.is/pTg6fhEXEeqNPk…

Rising CO2’s effect on crops could also harm human health. “We know unequivocally that when you...

This is the enormously misleading ***"nutrient scare."*** The absurdity of the nutrient scare nonsense should be obvious if you think about a simple fact: ***food grown in greenhouses at 1500 ppmv...

2/5. The result is that both articles are full of false information. My hypothes⋅is annotation of the Sneed article has a detailed, point-by-point critique of the major mistakes in it: via.hypothes.is/https://www.sc Scroll down and click on each highlighted section to see the critique of that section. (Let me know whether it works for you.)

3/5. Agronomists have conducted THOUSANDS of rigorous studies, measuring the benefits of elevated CO2 (eCO2) for crops. All major crops benefit from eCO2, most of them dramatically. sealevel.info/learnmore.html It's long-settled science. In fact, the benefits of eCO2 for crops have been known to science for >100 yrs.

4/5. There is no downside to eCO2 for agriculture. None whatsoever. It is entirely beneficial. twitter.com/ncdave4life/st

Dave Burton
@ncdave4life

Oct 20 23

View on Twitter

6/11. The Climate Industry wants you to believe that top scientists like Arrhenius, Koonin, Happer, Dyson & Clauser, and the entire discipline of agronomy, are all part of a vast, secret, right-wing Conspiracy, ongoing for >100 years, to hide the harmful effects of CO2. sealevel.info/freeman_dyson_ "Non-climatic effects of carbon dioxide as a sustainer of wildlife and crop plants are enormously beneficial, that the possibly harmful climatic effects of carbon dioxide have been greatly exaggerated, and that the benefits clearly outweigh the possible damage." -Freeman Dyson

Jeppe Have Rasmussen
@Jeppespip

Oct 22 23

View on Twitter

You are misleading people. eu.usatoday.com/story/news/fac

While CO2 can stimulate plant growth, too much of the gas creates adverse effects on vegetation and the environment as a whole.

eu.usatoday.com/story/news/fac…

Fact check: Excess CO2 harms plants more than helps them, experts say

5/5. If you think CO2 emissions and rising CO2 levels are harmful, you've been deceived. They are clearly beneficial. To understand #ClimateChange (or any other politicized or contentious topic), you need balanced information. I'm here to help: twitter.com/ncdave4life/st

Dave Burton
@ncdave4life

Jan 09 20

View on Twitter

To learn about #ClimateChange see: tinyurl.com/learnmore4 It has: ● accurate intro climatology info ● in-depth science from BOTH skeptics & alarmists ● links to balanced debates between experts on BOTH sides ● info about climate impacts ● links to best blogs on BOTH sides