1/7. Paul, http://Sealevel.info is my very sunny site. If you find errors on it I'll be sincerely grateful if you tell me. (See "About" for contact info.) But the graph I used is from NOAA. My caption says, "Illustration omitted from Slangen et al (2016)…" Is that unclear? https://sealevel.info/1612340_Honolulu_2022-03_natural_vs_anthro1.png…

2/7. I gave you the link to the source for NOAA's graph: https://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/sltrends/sltrends_station.shtml?id=1612340… Did you overlook it? I added the red, green & brown annotation, and bottommost caption, based on Slangen's reported conclusions.

3/7. I also gave you the link to the graph on my site: https://sealevel.info/MSL_graph.php?id=Honolulu… As both sites report, the linear trend is 1.54 ±0.20 mm/yr (which is 6 inches per century). NOAA doesn't calculate/report acceleration, but I do. The acceleration there is 0.000 ±0.013 mm/yr². https://sealevel.info/1612340_Honolulu_thru_2024-02_vs_CO2_annot1.png…

4/7. My point was that Slangen should have included a graph like that, which shows what her conclusion implies about the causes of measured sea-level trends. She didn't, of course, presumably because that would've made it too obvious how absurd her conclusion was.

5/7. Here's how Slangen attributes Sydney's sea-level rise: https://sealevel.info/680-140_Sydney_2016-04_anthro_vs_natural2.png… Here's how Slangen attributes Honolulu's sea-level rise: https://sealevel.info/1612340_Honolulu_2022-03_natural_vs_anthro1.png… I hope it is clear how nonsensical that is.

6/7. I have no idea why you think "measuring in Honolulu is not viable." I disagree. NOAA obviously disagrees, too, because they've been doing it for 119 years. https://x.com/ncdave4life/status/1800295378887364841…

7/7. To understand a contentious & politicized topic like climate change, you need balanced information. To that end, I've compiled a little list of high quality resources, here: https://sealevel.info/learnmore.html?0=dummies… It has: ● accurate introductory climatology information ● in-depth science from BOTH  skeptics & alarmists ● links to balanced debates between experts on BOTH  sides ● accurate information about impacts of CO2 & climate change, such as the effects on crop yields ● links to the best blogs on BOTH  sides of the climate debate