2/10. Scientific consensuses exist about many things, but we don't talk much about them, because we don't disagree about them. If there's a hot debate about the existence of a consensus, it means there's no consensus.
3/10. One of the dishonest tactics used by the parasitic climate industry to promote their products is to pretend there's a scientific consensus that the "climate crisis" is real. That's a plain lie.
https://x.com/ncdave4life/status/1792682125226921987…
The reason that climate industry propagandists ask only "gimme" questions in their polls is that that know that if they asked meaningful questions they'd find nothing resembling a consensus. Most thoughtful scientists are skeptical of climate alarmism.
https://x.com/ncdave4life/status/1792125357308457310…
4/10. Censorship is a fundamental part of climate activism. One of the main ways climate activists promote the lie that there's a "consensus" among scientists for the so-called "climate crisis" is by suppressing viewpoints which differ from their own.
6/10. I searched for years for climate alarmist blogs that aren't censored to promote the climate industry's agenda. I found a few, but you've probably never heard of them. The major alarmist blogs are all heavily censored.
https://sealevel.info/learnmore.html?0=blogs#blogs…
7/10. "Coming out" as a climate realist is a sure way to not get tenure in leftist-controlled schools. It's a safe bet that if Prof. Taylor had chaired the department's tenure and promotion committee at Princeton, Prof. Dyson would've been denied tenure.
https://x.com/ncdave4life/status/1794676500127437172…
19/19› I'll conclude with the wisdom of the late Prof. Freeman Dyson:
"…non-climatic effects of carbon dioxide as a sustainer of wildlife and crop plants are enormously beneficial… possibly harmful climatic effects of carbon dioxide have been greatly exaggerated, and… the benefits clearly outweigh the possible damage."
When he wrote these words he was, by general consensus, America's most distinguished living scientist. He was the man who took over Einstein's position, when Einstein died.
Prof. Dyson knew that manmade climate change is modest & benign, and CO2 emissions are beneficial, not harmful.
8/10. The real climate debate isn't about whether 'climate change is real.' The real debate is whether Nobel Laurate and "Father of Climatology" Svante Arrhenius was right or wrong, when he predicted that CO2 emissions would be highly beneficial.
https://sealevel.info/learnmore.html?0=arrhenius#arrhenius…
10/10. To understand a contentious & politicized topic like #ClimateChange, you need balanced information. I'm here to help:
https://sealevel.info/learnmore.html?0=dummies…
That resource list has:
● accurate introductory climatology information
● in-depth science from BOTH skeptics & alarmists
● links to balanced debates between experts on BOTH sides
● accurate information about impacts of CO2 & climate change, such as the effects on crop yields
● links to the best blogs on BOTH sides of the climate debate