Thread Reader
NamiW

NamiW
@nami_m_wang

Aug 31, 2025
18 tweets
Tweet

so I had an idea for a small video game and decided to vibe it out, to see what (and how fast) I can build, now with the help of a πŸ€–coding agent. on average, I’ve spent ~1 hour a day on this (some days I skip it tho). #gamedev

I'm thinking a 2d, minimalistic, roguelike, hex-grid-based tower defense game. code name: CENTRAL DEFENSE. I haven’t thought through the full design yet, just one core idea and a few basics mechanics.
for the stack, I tried few lightweight engines like Excalibur, hex-engine, and a handwritten one using miniflux+pixi. I settled on @KAPLAY.js - The fun JavaScript Game Library for simplicity. I don't need a powerful engine with a fancy editor, I want to define everything via code which fits the vibing approach.
for the vibing part, I mostly use @GitHub Copilot since I've got the enterprise license (yes, even on my personal github account, thank you @Microsoft ). I use the local vscode/copilot combo plus the async copilot agent, which creates its own PRs from the issues I assigned.
in preparation, I dumped the docs/guides for the core libraries (kaplay for game engine, honeycomb for hex grid, etc.) into my codebase; maintain a simple tasks.md file plus instructions;
general workflow: - pick 1 major feature to work on locally, alongside the copilot - pick several other tasks, create issues and assign those to the copilot agent - rotate between PRs while waiting so yes, async vibing is a thing and context-switching is the new silver bullet.
and I know there are fancy workflows with task system, but I find those overwhelming. or maybe I just haven't found a good one (suggestions welcome).
model-wise, I mostly use sonnet 4, sometimes gpt-5. I don't have a full set of benchmark. for the async agent, there's no way to specify the model, I'd like to know that. I believe there's one initial step to determine which model to use.
the good about the async copilot agent: it often works, it can code and take screenshots.
now the bad about the async copilot agent #1: it's slow, ~15mins for one iteration. plus it burns github action minutes. 2000/3000 (on free/pro plan) isn't enough for a serious project. I rarely hit copilot requests limits, but I easily used up all 3000 action minutes.
the bad about the async copilot agent #2: when taking the screenshot, it struggles to follow instructions (e.g. first click this button to enter this stage), being a game with no DOM elements certainly doesn't help.
now the dev journal legend πŸ‘¨πŸ»β€πŸ’» - I did most of the work (vibing, refactoring, fixing, polishing) πŸ€– - the agent did most of the work with some intervention
day 0-1 - bootstrapped the project day 2 - πŸ‘¨πŸ»β€πŸ’»: a prototype with a grid, enemies spawning, a turret that rotates and shoots - πŸ€–: a second menu "stage" with basic ui buttons
day 3 πŸ€– grid background animation effect πŸ€– a virtual joystick to control the rotation (this one impressed me) πŸ‘¨πŸ»β€πŸ’» general refactoring
day 4 πŸ€–πŸ‘¨πŸ»β€πŸ’» basic enemies spawning πŸ€– a ray to show shooting direction πŸ‘¨πŸ»β€πŸ’» general refactors
day 5-6 πŸ‘¨πŸ»β€πŸ’» better barrier slots rendering πŸ€– turret shooting recoil effect πŸ€– engine rotating sound effect πŸ‘¨πŸ»β€πŸ’» general improvements
day 7 πŸ€–πŸ‘¨πŸ»β€πŸ’» UI: hex as button πŸ€–πŸ‘¨πŸ»β€πŸ’» UI: health bar with icon
day 8 πŸ€–πŸ‘¨πŸ»β€πŸ’» a debug scene to help me marking shape/area of graphic (thanks @Kenney for assets) πŸ‘¨πŸ»β€πŸ’» general fixes
NamiW

NamiW

@nami_m_wang
πŸƒ Morning Runner | πŸ’Ό Daytime Developer @Microsoft | πŸŒ™ Evening Indie Creator
Follow on 𝕏
Missing some tweets in this thread? Or failed to load images or videos? You can try to .