O’Sullivan cites a study linking loneliness with symptoms in children as a clue
#LongCOVID is psychosomatic. But correlation isn’t causation. She appears to be referring to the CLoCk study, which has a number of problems as highlighted by David Tuller.
https://virology.ws/2023/04/17/trial-by-error-professors-crawley-chalder-colleagues-investigate-pediatric-long-covid-in-yet-another-study-with-a-stupid-acronym/…When challenged O’Sullivan cites Paul Garner’s recovery as evidence
#LongCOVID is psychosomatic. But a single recovery story (N=1) cannot establish causation or explain a heterogeneous condition affecting millions.
O’Sullivan mentions Garner’s is a professor of infectious diseases as an appeal to authority. But he has said he’d been influenced by “activist rhetoric” when assessing evidence on
#MECFS, suggesting he can be swayed by rhetoric.
I generally avoid analysing individual recovery stories. But when one case is repeatedly used in the media to support psychosomatic explanations of
#LongCOVID, it’s reasonable to note that a number of people have raised questions about his account.
https://x.com/keithgeraghty/status/1865895667828248606?s=61…O’Sullivan has history of wrongly claiming that illnesses are psychosomatic. She did this with
#MECFS in 2015. That framing goes against guidance from major health agencies such as NICE and the CDC.
https://me-pedia.org/wiki/Suzanne_O%27Sullivan…