Thread Reader
Tweet

1/3 BREAKING: On Sept. 16, CMS Superintendent Dr. Crystal Hill sent an email to board members titled “Board of Education Contracts and Governance Concerns”. There are two parts to the email first obtained by @107.9 FM WBT, Charlotte's News Talk:    -In the body of the email, she lays out her job requirements and essentially says she’s ready, willing and able to talk to the members collectively or individually about topics.    -A 224 page pdf file was attached explaining everything she knows about the current situation involving Board Chair Stephanie Sneed, Raki McGregor, the law firm Poyner Spruill. The first 14 pages are a layout of a very specific timeline of everything involving CMS, the CMS Board, Poyner Spruill, and all of McGregor’s dealings with the previous mentioned parties.    Here are some of the highlights of the timeline, which starts on Sept. 1, 2024:   May/June 2025: I met with Mr. McGregor and, later, the cabinet team to remind everyone that certain political activities must be avoided when they are connected to professional obligations for CMS. In multiple separate conversations, I asked Mr. McGregor not to draw me into political conversations and not to give anyone the impression that I support a particular candidate or candidates. My reminders regarding political activities were consistent with Board Policy Code P-POLI.   June 2025: I became concerned that Mr. McGregor was looking to take advantage of his role as Executive in Residence, his proximity to sitting members of the Board of Education, and his association with candidates running for seats on the Board of Education. Mr. McGregor was very upset with the three Board members who voted against the SYDKIMYL contract. I believe he wanted to help get candidates elected to the Board who would approve additional SYDKIMYL contracts. May/June 2025: I met with Mr. McGregor and, later, the cabinet team to remind everyone that certain political activities must be avoided when they are connected to professional obligations for CMS. In multiple separate conversations, I asked Mr. McGregor not to draw me into political conversations and not to give anyone the impression that I support a particular candidate or candidates. My reminders regarding political activities were consistent with Board Policy Code P-POLI.   June 2025: I became concerned that Mr. McGregor was looking to take advantage of his role as Executive in Residence, his proximity to sitting members of the Board of Education, and his association with candidates running for seats on the Board of Education. Mr. McGregor was very upset with the three Board members who voted against the SYDKIMYL contract. I believe he wanted to help get candidates elected to the Board who would approve additional SYDKIMYL contracts. February 4, 2026: A Poyner Spruill billing entry on this date shows, “Office conference with Katie Cornetto and Brandon McPherson re potential hiring of consultant for the schools through Poyner Spruill and best means to do so.” I never initiated a conversation with Poyner Spruill about hiring a consultant for the schools and I do not know of any reason why this would be an appropriate task for Poyner Spruill to undertake. I have only recently received the billing statements for Poyner Spruill.   March 16, 2026: During the weekly Chair and Vice Chair meeting (“C/VC”), Chair Sneed directed me not to include approximately $4.5 Million for an additional teacher supplement for teachers with 15 to 25 years of experience in my budget recommendation. Chair Sneed indicated there was a better use of funds. VC Rankin asked what the Chair wanted to use the funding for, but she did not respond directly. Chair Sneed asked that we put the funds on “hold.” I explained I must present a balanced budget and I can’t put the money on hold, so I put the $4.5 Million toward the local funding of anticipated state raises.

2/3 March 25, 2026: Poyner Spruill and Qonnect, LLC, entered into a Strategic Services Agreement for Qonnect (“Consultant”) to provide “strategic advisory, influence advisory, and related services” to support Poyner Spruill’s contract with CMS related to the At Home in CMS project. The term of the contract is one year, during which time Poyner Spruill paid Consultant $30,000 a month. Exhibit F. Qonnect, LLC is owned by Raki McGregor. I was unaware of the engagement with Qonnect, LLC and Raki McGregor at the time this contract was entered, and I believe most Board members were also unaware. However, Poyner Spruill’s billing entries seem to indicate Chair Sneed was having regular meetings with Poyner Spruill and “Consultant.” As Superintendent, I was tasked with handling the At Home in CMS project and these efforts were carried out by my Recruitment, Retention, and Talent team. I do not know how, why, or when this program was turned over to Poyner Spruill, Chair Sneed, and Raki McGregor. To my knowledge, and that of my staff, Mr. McGregor has not provided any meaningful input or assistance with the At Home in CMS initiative since his Executive In Residence contract ended on June 30, 2025.   April 10, 2026: The Board of Education issued a Request for Proposals (“RFP”) for a law firm to conduct a “Compliance Assessment.” I found this decision to be unusual and suspected the Board was launching a fishing expedition for grounds to terminate me. The Board is not supposed to be involved in the day-to-day operations of the school district and no one ever spoke to me about the RFP or need for a compliance assessment.    June 5, 2026: Poyner Spruill and Qonnect, LLC, entered into a Strategic Services Agreement for Qonnect (“Consultant”) to provide “strategic advisory, influence advisory, and related services” to support Poyner Spruill’s contract with CMS related to the “Compliance Assessment” project. The term of the contract began June 5, 2026, and continues through September 30, 2026, during which time Poyner Spruill is paying Consultant up to $132,000.    June 9, 2026: I was told the Board received “several serious allegations” related to my management of the school system and that I would be suspended due to the “nature of the allegations” and investigated. I was told this information would never be made public if I resigned by Friday. I consider this extortion. (For more information regarding my suspension and the investigation, see my Memorandum concerning the investigation.) Importantly, since the investigation concluded, I have learned that one of the matters used to justify my suspension and investigation had already been investigated by OGC.   August 22, 2026: Board member Shamaiye Haynes responded to my email and copied two district employees criticizing me for reporting “serious characterizations” to the full Board “before current facts and support documentation have been obtained and reviewed.” (I am still astounded by the irony of this statement.) Further, Ms. Haynes stated my report “does not establish misconduct or a governance concern and risks creating an unfair impression” about Chair Sneed’s actions. Ms. Hanes then asked that “concerns involving the Board Chair, Board Operations staff, legal invoices, or potential noncompliance be verified with the individuals directly involved before conclusions are circulated to the full Board.” I am concerned about Ms. Haynes’ flagrant violation of Board policy. It is neither required nor appropriate for me to take my concerns about Board governance to a single Board member, nor is it my role to “establish misconduct” before bringing information to the Board.
3/3 September 9, 2026: I learned through an email from Ms. Hehenberger that Mr. McGregor is benefiting from a second contract with Poyner Spruill related to a compliance assessment of district operations, specifically targeting HR and finance. Mr. McGregor is receiving $132,000.00 of the $220,000 paid to Poyner Spruill for the assessment. This is $13,000/month; the same amount he was paid while working for CMS as Executive in Residence. Similar to the At Home in CMS contract, Mr. McGregor is being treated as a “consultant” with a contract term from June 5 to September 30, 2026. There are many issues with this arrangement, including: 1) Mr. McGregor does not have public school administration experience in the areas of HR or finance and is not qualified to conduct this review; 2) the scope of services in Mr. McGregor’s contract is nonsensical (and is identical to the housing scope of work) and not measurable; 3) the Board paid Brooks Pierce nearly $400,000 for my investigation, which it claimed included a review of HR and finance; 4) Mr. McGregor is motivated to identify problems with my leadership because I ended his relationship with CMS; 5) none of my staff have had any interaction with Mr. 13 McGregor regarding this “review”; 6) Poyner Spruill requested confidential records that are not related to a general compliance review; 7) Mr. McGregor’s contract with Poyner Spruill does not include an adequate confidentiality provision. As you know, Ms. Hehenberger also has concerns about the lack of transparency regarding this contract and potential conflicts of interest.   September 10, 2026: I learned Poyner Spruill has completed its compliance review and is prepared to present to the Board. I find this surprising since no one from Poyner Spruill has spoken to me about the scope of the compliance review or findings.
Brett Jensen WBT News
Award-winning reporter that’s covered wars and all levels of politics & sports. Love my golden retriever, golf, history & Cajun food. https://t.co/U3XtdVjVal
Follow on 𝕏
Missing some tweets in this thread? Or failed to load images or videos? You can try to .