Dave Burton
@ncdave4life

Oct 28, 2023

glossary.html# (Caveat: I've been an IPCC Expert Reviewer on a couple of their assessment reports.)

2/25. It's only gotten worse since then. The IPCC's 2022 AR6 Report explicitly promotes what I call "homeopathic climatology" (TCRE/RCB), which represents an overt rejection of science. twitter.com/ncdave4life/st

Dave Burton
@ncdave4life

Jun 21 23

View on Twitter

"The cause," eh? Too many so-called "climate scientists" put The Cause ahead of the science. twitter-thread.com/t/167010695420 twitter.com/ncdave4life/st TCRE & RCB are homeopathic climatology: the claim that mere memory of a substance is all that is necessary for it to have its effect.

twitter-thread.com/t/167010695420…

@EthonRaptor @ClimateOfGavin @NASAGoddard 1/6 Eli, please tell me that YOU do not think CO2 which...

@EthonRaptor @ClimateOfGavin @NASAGoddard 1/6 Eli, please tell me that YOU do not think CO2 which was FORMERLY in the air STILL has a warming effect! I was SURE you are smarter than THAT! Any two...

3/25. The TCRE ("Transient Climate Response to cumulative CO2 Emissions") and RCB ("Remaining Carbon Budget") concepts are homeopathy applied to climatology: the belief that the mere memory of a substance is all that's necessary for it to have its effect. twitter.com/ncdave4life/st

Dave Burton
@ncdave4life

Apr 17 23

View on Twitter

2/11」You can read about TCRE in AR6 WG1 5.5, TS.3.2.1, 1.6.3, etc. It's a completely nonsensical concept, based on the premise that, not merely does CO2 still in the air have a warming effect, but that the mere MEMORY by Gaia, of CO2 which WAS ONCE in the air, ALSO does!

4/25. It's as if they think The Ghost of CO2 Past haunts the atmosphere, continuing to warm the Earth long after the CO2 has been removed from the air and sequestered in other carbon reservoirs. fineartamerica.com/featured/the-g (Art by Dave Rheaume @Dave Rheaume Artist)

5/25. Of course, only GHGs still in the air actually have a warming effect. So a scientist who valued real science more than the IPCC's political agenda would denounce that TCRE & RCB pseudoscience. But I know of no climate alarmists who've done so. sealevel.info/learnmore.html sealevel.info/learnmore.html

6/25. The evidence is compelling that CO2 emissions are beneficial, not harmful. Here are some relevant papers about it: sealevel.info/negative_socia sealevel.info/negative_socia

7/25. You can learn much more about CO2 and it's effects, from a very fine scientific organization called The CO2 Coalition @CO2 Coalition. I'm honored to be a Member. This is their website: co2coalition.org twitter.com/GWrightstone/s

Gregory Wrightstone
@GWrightstone

May 08 23

View on Twitter

CO2 Coalition Announces Election of Nobel Laureate Dr. John Clauser to its Board of Directors. According to Clauser: "In my opinion, there is no real climate crisis" @Steve Milloy @Patrick Moore @Gordon Tomb @Vijay

8/25. The supposed major harms from CO2 emissions are all merely hypothetical, and mostly implausible. None of them are actually happening. For instance, the coral of the Great Barrier Reef are doing fine: thegwpf.com/peter-ridd-rec thegwpf.com/peter-ridd-rec

9/25. "Extreme weather" is not getting worse. Hurricanes, tornadoes, nor'easters &droughts, are not worsening. In fact, tornadoes & droughts have become much less destructive. twitter.com/ncdave4life/st Here're the facts on hurricanes, from an expert: rogerpielkejr.substack.com/p/2023-update-

Dave Burton
@ncdave4life

Oct 26 23

View on Twitter

1/17》Climate change is not making hurricanes more destructive. sealevel.info/learnmore.html

10/25. Droughts have showed a slight decreasing trend, but they're substantially less destructive now, because elevated CO2 levels make plants more water-efficient and drought-resilient. twitter.com/ncdave4life/st

Dave Burton
@ncdave4life

Jun 17 23

View on Twitter

17/ Also, elevated CO2 makes plants more water-efficient & drought-resilient, by improving CO2 stomatal conductance relative to transpiration. That's long-settled science among agronomists (though most climate scientists are apparently unfamiliar with it). twitter.com/ncdave4life/st

11/25. Strong tornadoes have decreased markedly (though nobody is sure why). sealevel.info/learnmore.html sealevel.info/learnmore.html

In-depth info & resources from both sides of the climate debate

sealevel.info/learnmore.html…

Learn more about climate change

12/25 🎜 🎝 Do you see what I see? ♪ ♬ twitter.com/ncdave4life/st ♩ A line, a line, running through the years A linear rise of the sea ♪

The tide gauge at Harlingen has a continuous sea-level measurement record all the way back to 1865. If it looks worrisome to you, counseling might help.

Dave Burton
@ncdave4life

Sep 27 23

View on Twitter

10/26》Contrary to climate industry propaganda, none of the supposed major harms of carbon emissions are actually happening. They are all merely hypothetical, and mostly implausible. Sea-level trends have been virtually unchanged for 90+ years. sealevel.info/learnmore.html sealevel.info/Dutch_dike_vs_

13/25. I also have many resources about CO2 and climate change here: sealevel.info/learnmore.html This resource list has: ● accurate intro climatology info ● in-depth science from BOTH skeptics & alarmists ● links to balanced debates between experts on BOTH sides ● info about climate impacts ● links to the best blogs on BOTH sides

14/25. Since the Little Ice Age, the Earth is generally estimated to have warmed by a grand total of 1.0 to 1.3°C, on average. (Nobody really knows.) NCA4 and the WMO estimate 1.02 to 1.27 °C. public.wmo.int/en/media/press

15/25. That's a little less than the hysteresis (a/k/a "dead band" or "dead zone") in a typical home thermostat, which is the amount that your indoor temperatures go up and down, all day long, without you even noticing it. sealevel.info/learnmore.html sealevel.info/learnmore.html

16/25. 1°C is the temperature change you get from an elevation change of about 500 feet (calculated from an average tropospheric lapse rate of 6.5°C/km). sealevel.info/VerticalStruct

17/25. At mid-latitudes, 1°C is about the temperature change you get from a latitude change of around 60 miles. sealevel.info/2015_zones_hig

18/25. In the American Midwest, farmers can fully compensate for a 1°C temperature change by adjusting planting dates by about six days.

19/25. Do you recognize how crazy it is for the climate industry to pretend that such a tiny temperature change is an "emergency?" twitter.com/ncdave4life/st

Dave Burton
@ncdave4life

Aug 31 21

View on Twitter

To learn about #ClimateChange see: sealevel.info/learnmore.html It has: ● accurate intro climatology info ● in-depth science from BOTH skeptics & alarmists ● links to balanced debates between experts on BOTH sides ● info about climate impacts ● links to best blogs on BOTH sides

sealevel.info/learnmore.html

Learn more about climate change

20/25. Actually, that's not what they pretend. They pretend less than half of that is a dire threat! What they call "1.5°C warming" is actually just 0.35°C warmer than present. That's because their baseline is an estimate of late Little Ice Age "pre-industrial" average temperature.

21/25. They obviously do that to reduce the sniggering which would result if they called a prospective temperature change of 0.35°C an "emergency."

22/25. There's a broad consensus among historians and scientists that the Little Ice Age climate was worse than our current, warmer climate. Nevertheless, that neo-boreal (cold) climate is what the "net zero" campaigners are trying to return us to. sealevel.info/CIA1974Climate

23/25. Many climate activists seem to be meeting some sort of irrational emotional need to find something to be alarmed about. twitter.com/ncdave4life/st

Dave Burton
@ncdave4life

May 22 23

View on Twitter

1/12》Many climate activists just PRETEND to be worried about #ClimateChange. They LIKE being alarmed. The proof is in their reactions. When a "worse than we thought" story hits the press, they're gleeful. But when you show them good news, they're angry. sealevel.info/learnmore.html

sealevel.info/learnmore.html…

Learn more about climate change

24/25. But it's clear that most of the people who write the checks for the "climate emergency" propaganda campaign don't really care about the global temperature. They're just selling products. Example: theguardian.com/environment/20 theguardian.com/environment/20

Nato chief, Anders Fogh Rasmussen, says Moscow mounting disinformation campaign to maintain reliance on Russian gas

theguardian.com/environment/20…

Russia 'secretly working with environmentalists to oppose fracking'

25/25. That's why they aren't worried about China's & India's massive coal power plant buildout. It's all about the Benjamins, baby. twitter.com/ncdave4life/st

Dave Burton
@ncdave4life

Mar 06 21

View on Twitter

You're right that climate activists "don't call it a crisis for nothing." $1.5 trillion/yr ain't "nothing." It's all about the Benjamins. They call it a crisis to amp up support for feeding Piggy. The parasitic climate industry requires a LOT of propaganda to keep it propped up.